Fendt 209 PA vs New Holland TN 95 DA
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 209 PA and the TN 95 DA → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
8 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 209 PA | TN 95 DA | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 89 hp | 89 hp | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 250 lb·ft · 339 N·m | 268 lb·ft · 364 N·m | +7% TN 95 DA |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | dry multi-plate clutch | Oil-immersed multi-plate clutch with six plates of 113 mm diameter | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic control declared | Load sensing | Constant flow | differs |
| Pump flow declared | 19.5 gpm · 74.0 L/min | 12.5 gpm · 47.4 L/min | +56% 209 PA |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/750/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,404 lb · 2,905 kg | 6,724 lb · 3,050 kg | — |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 11,023 lb · 5,000 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 87.4 in · 2,221 mm | 86.0 in · 2,185 mm | — |
| Length declared | 144.3 in · 3,665 mm | 140.5 in · 3,568 mm | — |
| Width declared | 65.6 in · 1,666 mm | 79.1 in · 2,010 mm | +21% TN 95 DA |
| Height declared | 95.3 in · 2,420 mm | 92.1 in · 2,340 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 11.6 in · 295 mm | 14.2 in · 360 mm | +22% TN 95 DA |
| Fuel tank declared | 74.0 qt · 70 L | 93.0 qt · 88 L | +26% TN 95 DA |
Fendt 209 PA sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 PA”
New Holland TN 95 DA sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN95 DA”
- Source: OECD test report 2346, 2006