Fendt 209 FA vs UTB U-833 DT
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (46%). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
10 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 209 FA | U-833 DT | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 89 hp | 87.8 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | UTB 2404.062 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 3.76 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 250 lb·ft · 339 N·m | 232 lb·ft · 314 N·m | +8% 209 FA |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +33% 209 FA |
| Clutch declared | Dry multi-disc clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 19.5 gpm · 74.0 L/min | 10.6 gpm · 40.0 L/min | +85% 209 FA |
| Pressure declared | 2,901 psi · 200 bar | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/750/1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 6,085 lb · 2,760 kg | 8,907 lb · 4,040 kg | +46% U-833 DT |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 8,818 lb · 4,000 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 86.1 in · 2,187 mm | 90.2 in · 2,291 mm | — |
| Length declared | 139.5 in · 3,544 mm | 163.4 in · 4,150 mm | +17% U-833 DT |
| Width declared | 54.0 in · 1,372 mm | 76.3 in · 1,939 mm | +41% U-833 DT |
| Height declared | 95.3 in · 2,420 mm | 109.8 in · 2,790 mm | +15% U-833 DT |
| Ground clearance declared | 8.7 in · 220 mm | 13.8 in · 350 mm | +59% U-833 DT |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 14.4 ft · 4.40 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 74.0 qt · 70 L | 105.7 qt · 100.0 L | +43% U-833 DT |
Fendt 209 FA sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA”
UTB U-833 DT sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 833 DT”