Fendt 209 FA or Fendt 209 VA/VA-breit?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 209 FA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 209 VA/VA-breit has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt 209 FA suits road haulage better on this data: 14% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 209 FA | 209 VA/VA-breit | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 66 kW (89 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA” | 66 kW (89 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 VA” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 209 FA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 209 VA/VA-breit has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 209 FA and the 209 VA/VA-breit. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 209 FA and the 209 VA/VA-breit. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 74.0 L/min (19.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA” | 74.0 L/min (19.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 VA” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,694 kg (5,939 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA” | 2,694 kg (5,939 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 VA” | EvenNo call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,760 kg (6,085 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA” | 2,545 kg (5,611 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 VA” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA” | 4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 VA” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA” | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 VA” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 209 FA and the 209 VA/VA-breit. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA” | 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 VA” | AheadThe Fendt 209 FA has 14% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fendt 209 VA/VA-breit (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA” | 540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 VA” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 750, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 209 FA and the 209 VA/VA-breit. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 FA” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 209 VA” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2009 | 2002–2009 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt 209 FA has 14% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Fendt 209 VA/VA-breit (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- No call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 750, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 209 FA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 209 VA/VA-breit has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources