Fendt Farmer 2 E or Renault N 31?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fendt Farmer 2E: hydraulic flow.
- The Fendt Farmer 2E suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 25% (3.4 L/min / 0.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Farmer 2 E | N 31 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 28.2 kW (37.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 2 E” | 28.3 kW (38.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmer 2 E and the N 31. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmer 2 E and the N 31. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 17.5 L/min (4.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 2 E” | 14.0 L/min (3.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 2E has 25% more hydraulic flow (3.4 L/min / 0.9 gpm) than the Renault N 31 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,500 kg (3,307 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 2 E” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the N 31. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,960 kg (4,321 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 2 E” | 1,545 kg (3,406 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Farmer 2E is 27% heavier (415 kg / 915 lb) than the Renault N 31 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 2 E” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the N 31. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | — | 6 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the Farmer 2 E. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmer 2 E and the N 31. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 2 E” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 550Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 2 E” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Farmer 2 E. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 2 E” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the N 31. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 2 E” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault N, E, V31 R3051” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1968–1970 | 1957–1962 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Farmer 2E is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Farmer 2E has 25% more hydraulic flow (3.4 L/min / 0.9 gpm) than the Renault N 31 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Farmer 2E is 27% heavier (415 kg / 915 lb) than the Renault N 31 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Farmer 2E is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, forward gears, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources