Fendt Farmer 105 or Schlüter Compact 550 (V)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Farmer 105 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Compact 550 (V) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt Farmer 105 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (7.6 L/min / 2.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt Farmer 105 and Schlüter Compact 550 (V), with the call on each
QuestionFarmer 105Compact 550 (V)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?42.6 kW (57.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”42.5 kW (57.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 550 /550V”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 105 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Compact 550 (V) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Farmer 105 and the Compact 550 (V).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Farmer 105 and the Compact 550 (V).
Which pumps more oil for implements?33.6 L/min (8.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”26.0 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 550 /550V”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 105 has 29% more hydraulic flow (7.6 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Schlüter Compact 550 (V) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”1,500 kg (3,307 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 550 /550V”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Farmer 105: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”); the Compact 550 (V): lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 550 /550V”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,440 kg (5,379 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”2,690 kg (5,930 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 550 /550V”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Compact 550 (V) is 10% heavier (250 kg / 551 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 105 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Compact 550 (V).
Which has the wider choice of gears?13Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”8Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 550 /550V”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 105 has 63% more forward gears (5 gears) than the Schlüter Compact 550 (V) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Farmer 105 and the Compact 550 (V).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”26 km/h (16.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 550 /550V”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/582 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”586/1175 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 550 /550V”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Compact 550 (V).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Compact 550 (V).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 550 /550V”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1972–19731972EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt Farmer 105 has 29% more hydraulic flow (7.6 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Schlüter Compact 550 (V) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Schlüter Compact 550 (V) is 10% heavier (250 kg / 551 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 105 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 105 has 63% more forward gears (5 gears) than the Schlüter Compact 550 (V) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Farmer 105 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Compact 550 (V) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Farmer 105: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 105”); the Compact 550 (V): lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 550 /550V”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources