Fendt F 380 GTA-Turbo or Massey Ferguson MF 6255 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the F 380 GTA-Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6255 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6255 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt F 380 GTA-Turbo and Massey Ferguson MF 6255 (A), with the call on each
QuestionF 380 GTA-TurboMF 6255 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?70 kW (94 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F 380 GTA-Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6255 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the F 380 GTA-Turbo and the MF 6255 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the F 380 GTA-Turbo and the MF 6255 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?95.7 L/min (25.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the F 380 GTA-Turbo.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,380 kg (9,656 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”4,250 kg (9,370 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the F 380 GTA-Turbo: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”); the MF 6255 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,400 kg (9,700 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”4,195 kg (9,248 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”8,800 kg (19,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6255 (A) has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the Fendt F 380 GTA-Turbo (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the F 380 GTA-Turbo and the MF 6255 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”AheadThe Fendt F 380 GTA-Turbo offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson MF 6255 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–20041999–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6255 (A) has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the Fendt F 380 GTA-Turbo (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt F 380 GTA-Turbo offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson MF 6255 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the F 380 GTA-Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6255 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the F 380 GTA-Turbo: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 380 GTA Turbo”); the MF 6255 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6255”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources