Fendt 370 GT or URSUS 5312/5314?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 370 GT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5312/5314 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The URSUS 5312/5314 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 53% (21.3 L/min / 5.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Fendt 370 GT suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt 370 GT and URSUS 5312/5314, with the call on each
Question370 GT5312/5314Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?52 kW (70 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”52.2 kW (70.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 370 GT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5312/5314 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 370 GT and the 5312/5314.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 370 GT and the 5312/5314.
Which pumps more oil for implements?40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”61.3 L/min (16.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”AheadThe URSUS 5312/5314 has 53% more hydraulic flow (21.3 L/min / 5.6 gpm) than the Fendt 370 GT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,270 kg (7,209 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 370 GT: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”); the 5312/5314: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,590 kg (7,915 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”3,180 kg (7,011 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt 370 GT is 13% heavier (410 kg / 904 lb) than the URSUS 5312/5314 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,290 kg (11,662 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5312/5314.
Which has the wider choice of gears?21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”AheadThe Fendt 370 GT has 75% more forward gears (9 gears) than the URSUS 5312/5314 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 370 GT and the 5312/5314.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”AheadThe Fendt 370 GT has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the URSUS 5312/5314 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”AheadThe Fendt 370 GT offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS 5312/5314 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 5312/5314.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”AheadThe URSUS 5312/5314 is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt 370 GT is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1996–20041993–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The URSUS 5312/5314 has 53% more hydraulic flow (21.3 L/min / 5.6 gpm) than the Fendt 370 GT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt 370 GT is 13% heavier (410 kg / 904 lb) than the URSUS 5312/5314 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt 370 GT has 75% more forward gears (9 gears) than the URSUS 5312/5314 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt 370 GT has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the URSUS 5312/5314 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt 370 GT offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the URSUS 5312/5314 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The URSUS 5312/5314 is available with four-wheel drive; the Fendt 370 GT is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 370 GT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5312/5314 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 370 GT: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”); the 5312/5314: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources