Fendt 927 Vario or Lamborghini 240 Traction?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 927 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 240 Traction has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt 927 Vario suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 58% (4,400 kg / 9,700 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Fendt 927 Vario suits road haulage better on this data: 50% (6,000 kg / 13,228 lb) more maximum permissible mass and 25% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 927 Vario | 240 Traction | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 176 kW (236 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 927 Vario” | 179.5 kW (240.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 927 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 240 Traction has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 927 Vario and the 240 Traction. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 927 Vario and the 240 Traction. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 77.6 L/min (20.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 927 Vario. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 927 Vario” | 7,600 kg (16,755 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240” | AheadThe Fendt 927 Vario has 58% more lift (4,400 kg / 9,700 lb) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 10,080 kg (22,223 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 927 Vario” | 8,901 kg (19,623 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt 927 Vario is 13% heavier (1,179 kg / 2,599 lb) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 18,000 kg (39,683 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 927 Vario” | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240” | AheadThe Fendt 927 Vario has 50% higher maximum permissible mass (6,000 kg / 13,228 lb) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 927 Vario” | 18 to 36 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Fendt 927 Vario is stepless (CVT) and the Lamborghini 240 Traction has 18 to 36 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 927 Vario and the 240 Traction. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 50 km/h (31.1 mph) to 60 km/h (37.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 927 Vario” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240” | AheadThe Fendt 927 Vario has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | — | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 927 Vario. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 927 Vario. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 927 Vario”; OECD test report 2544, 2010 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Traction 240” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2006–2015 | 1993–1994 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt 927 Vario is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt 927 Vario has 58% more lift (4,400 kg / 9,700 lb) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt 927 Vario is 13% heavier (1,179 kg / 2,599 lb) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt 927 Vario has 50% higher maximum permissible mass (6,000 kg / 13,228 lb) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt 927 Vario has 25% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini 240 Traction (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt 927 Vario is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Fendt 927 Vario is stepless (CVT) and the Lamborghini 240 Traction has 18 to 36 forward gears — not called.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 927 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 240 Traction has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources