Fendt 828 Vario or New Holland TG 285 (Traktorenlexikon)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 828 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 285 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt 828 Vario suits road haulage better on this data: 50% (20.0 km/h / 12.4 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt 828 Vario and New Holland TG 285 (Traktorenlexikon), with the call on each
Question828 VarioTG 285Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?205 kW (275 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 828 Vario”208.1 kW (279.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG285”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 828 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 285 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 828 Vario and the TG 285.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 828 Vario and the TG 285.
Which pumps more oil for implements?152 L/min (40.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 828 Vario”158.4 L/min (41.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG285”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?——No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 828 Vario and the TG 285.
Which is heavier, for traction?9,450 kg (20,834 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 828 Vario”9,609 kg (21,184 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG285”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?—14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG285”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 828 Vario.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 828 Vario”18 to 24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG285”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Fendt 828 Vario is stepless (CVT) and the New Holland TG 285 has 18 to 24 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 828 Vario and the TG 285.
Which is faster on the road?60 km/h (37.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 828 Vario”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG285”AheadThe Fendt 828 Vario has 50% more top speed (20.0 km/h / 12.4 mph) than the New Holland TG 285 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 828 Vario”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG285”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG285”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 828 Vario.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 828 Vario”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG285”; OECD test report 2189, 2004EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2010–2002–2005Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt 828 Vario is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt 828 Vario has 50% more top speed (20.0 km/h / 12.4 mph) than the New Holland TG 285 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt 828 Vario is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Fendt 828 Vario is stepless (CVT) and the New Holland TG 285 has 18 to 24 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 828 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 285 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources