Fendt 815 Vario / TMS or John Deere 6920?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 815 Vario / TMS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6920 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Fendt 815 Vario / TMS suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (1,790 kg / 3,946 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fendt 815 Vario / TMS and John Deere 6920, with the call on each
Question815 Vario / TMS6920Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?110 kW (148 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”110.4 kW (148.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 815 Vario / TMS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6920 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 815 Vario / TMS and the 6920.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 815 Vario / TMS and the 6920.
Which pumps more oil for implements?110.0 L/min (29.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 6920.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?9,255 kg (20,404 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”8,570 kg (18,894 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 815 Vario / TMS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”); the 6920: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,650 kg (14,661 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”6,590 kg (14,528 lb) to 6,640 kg (14,639 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?12,500 kg (27,558 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”10,710 kg (23,612 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”AheadThe Fendt 815 Vario / TMS has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (1,790 kg / 3,946 lb) than the John Deere 6920 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”20 to 32 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Fendt 815 Vario / TMS is stepless (CVT) and the John Deere 6920 has 20 to 32 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 815 Vario / TMS and the 6920.
Which is faster on the road?50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”540E/540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”AheadThe Fendt 815 Vario / TMS offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 6920 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 815 Vario / TMS.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”; OECD test report 2033, 2003; Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920 S”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2003–20092002–2007EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fendt 815 Vario / TMS has 17% higher maximum permissible mass (1,790 kg / 3,946 lb) than the John Deere 6920 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt 815 Vario / TMS offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 6920 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Fendt 815 Vario / TMS is stepless (CVT) and the John Deere 6920 has 20 to 32 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 815 Vario / TMS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6920 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 815 Vario / TMS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 815 Vario”); the 6920: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 6920”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources