Fendt 415 Vario vs Renault Ares 696 RZ

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Fendt 415 Vario

2006–2013

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

Renault Ares 696 RZ

2001–2005

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 415 Vario and the Ares 696 RZ → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

9 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Fendt 415 Vario and Renault Ares 696 RZ, field by field
Field415 VarioAres 696 RZGap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed138 hp138 hp
Engine declaredDeutz TCD 2012 L4-4VJOHN DEERE 6068 TRT 55 or 6068 TRT 72differs
Displacement declared4.04 L6.79 L+68% Ares 696 RZ
Maximum torque declared481 lb·ft · 652 N·m411 lb·ft · 556.6 N·m+17% 415 Vario
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h24.9 mph · 40 km/hdiffers
Clutch declaredTurbo clutch function, driving clutch
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredClosed centre
Hydraulic control declaredLoad sensing
Pressure declared2,828 psi · 195 bar
Three-point lift at ends declared19,048 lb · 8,640 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540/540E/750/1000 rpm540/1000/540E/1000E rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared12,015 lb · 5,450 kg13,305 lb · 6,035 kg+11% Ares 696 RZ
Maximum permissible mass declared20,393 lb · 9,250 kg
Wheelbase declared95.2 in · 2,417 mm108.3 in · 2,750 mm+14% Ares 696 RZ
Length declared168.5 in · 4,281 mm242.1 in · 6,150 mm+44% Ares 696 RZ
Width declared98.0 in · 2,490 mm100.4 in · 2,550 mm
Height declared116.3 in · 2,953 mm115.9 in · 2,945 mm
Ground clearance declared20.2 in · 512 mm20.1 in · 510 mm
Turning radius, braked declared14.9 ft · 4.53 m
Fuel tank declared258.9 qt · 245 L232.5 qt · 220.0 L+11% 415 Vario

Fendt 415 Vario sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 415 Vario”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 411 Vario”

Renault Ares 696 RZ sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 696 RZ”
  • Source: OECD test report 2122, 2004