Fahr D 90 or Güldner AF 15?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fahr D 90: maximum permissible mass. On features, the Güldner AF 15 is ahead on top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fahr D 90 and Güldner AF 15, with the call on each
QuestionD 90AF 15Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?8.8 kW (12 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 90”9.6 kW (13 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 15”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 90 and the AF 15.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 90 and the AF 15.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 90 and the AF 15.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?690 kg (1,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 90”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the AF 15.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,050 kg (2,315 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 90”1,225 kg (2,701 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 15”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner AF 15 is 17% heavier (175 kg / 386 lb) than the Fahr D 90 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?1,680 kg (3,704 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 90”1,500 kg (3,307 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 15”AheadThe Fahr D 90 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (180 kg / 397 lb) than the Güldner AF 15 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?5 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 90”5Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 15”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 90 and the AF 15.
Which is faster on the road?17.8 km/h (11.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 90”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 15”AheadThe Güldner AF 15 has 12% more top speed (2.2 km/h / 1.4 mph) than the Fahr D 90 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?588 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 90”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 15”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 90.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 15”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 90.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 90”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 15”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1953–19561949–1954EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Güldner AF 15 is 17% heavier (175 kg / 386 lb) than the Fahr D 90 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fahr D 90 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (180 kg / 397 lb) than the Güldner AF 15 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Güldner AF 15 has 12% more top speed (2.2 km/h / 1.4 mph) than the Fahr D 90 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources