Fahr D 60 L or J.I. Case 741?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the J.I. Case 741: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on PTO speeds and PTO independence.
- The J.I. Case 741 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm and an independent PTO.
- The J.I. Case 741 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 219% (40.5 L/min / 10.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 60 L | 741 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 42.7 kW (57 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 60 L” | 42.6 kW (57.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 741” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 60 L and the 741. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 60 L and the 741. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 18.5 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 60 L” | 59.0 L/min (15.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 741” | AheadThe J.I. Case 741 has 219% more hydraulic flow (40.5 L/min / 10.7 gpm) than the Fahr D 60 L (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 60 L and the 741. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,460 kg (7,628 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 60 L” | 3,137 kg (6,916 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 741” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fahr D 60 L is 10% heavier (323 kg / 712 lb) than the J.I. Case 741 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 60 L” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 741. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5 to 7Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 60 L” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Case 741” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 60 L and the 741. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 32.3 km/h (20.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 60 L” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 741” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 60 L” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 741” | AheadThe J.I. Case 741 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fahr D 60 L does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 60 L” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 741” | AheadThe J.I. Case 741 has an independent PTO; the Fahr D 60 L’s is dependent (stops with the clutch). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 60 L” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 741” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1952–1955 | 1960–1969 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 741 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The J.I. Case 741 has 219% more hydraulic flow (40.5 L/min / 10.7 gpm) than the Fahr D 60 L (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fahr D 60 L is 10% heavier (323 kg / 712 lb) than the J.I. Case 741 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 741 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fahr D 60 L does not (as stated by the sources).
- The J.I. Case 741 has an independent PTO; the Fahr D 60 L’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
- The J.I. Case 741 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources