Fahr D 540 or Lamborghini R-360 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 540 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-360 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Lamborghini R-360 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 31% (5.7 L/min / 1.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Fahr D 540 suits road haulage better on this data: 28% (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fahr D 540 and Lamborghini R-360 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionD 540R-360 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?43.9 kW (58.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 540”44.1 kW (59.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 540 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-360 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 540 and the R-360 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 540 and the R-360 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?18.5 L/min (4.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 540”24.2 L/min (6.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)”AheadThe Lamborghini R-360 (DT) has 31% more hydraulic flow (5.7 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Fahr D 540 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,080 kg (4,586 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 540.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,330 kg (7,341 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 540”2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fahr D 540 is 31% heavier (780 kg / 1,720 lb) than the Lamborghini R-360 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,100 kg (9,039 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 540”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the R-360 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?5 to 7Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 540”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 540 and the R-360 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?32 km/h (19.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 540”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)”AheadThe Fahr D 540 has 28% more top speed (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) than the Lamborghini R-360 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 540”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)”AheadThe Lamborghini R-360 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fahr D 540 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 540”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)”AheadThe Lamborghini R-360 (DT) has an independent PTO; the Fahr D 540’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 540”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R 360 (DT)”AheadThe Lamborghini R-360 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Fahr D 540 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1955–19581969–1972Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini R-360 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Lamborghini R-360 (DT) has 31% more hydraulic flow (5.7 L/min / 1.5 gpm) than the Fahr D 540 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fahr D 540 is 31% heavier (780 kg / 1,720 lb) than the Lamborghini R-360 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Fahr D 540 has 28% more top speed (7.0 km/h / 4.3 mph) than the Lamborghini R-360 (DT) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini R-360 (DT) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fahr D 540 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Lamborghini R-360 (DT) has an independent PTO; the Fahr D 540’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
  • The Lamborghini R-360 (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Fahr D 540 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Lamborghini R-360 (DT) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 540 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R-360 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources