Fahr D 28 UW or Steyr 188?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Steyr 188 is ahead on forward gears and top speed; the Fahr D 28 UW is ahead on PTO independence.

  • The Fahr D 28 UW suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: an independent PTO.
  • The Steyr 188 suits road haulage better on this data: 50% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fahr D 28 UW and Steyr 188, with the call on each
QuestionD 28 UW188Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?16.9 kW (23 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 28 U”17.4 kW (23.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 188”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 28 UW and the 188.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 28 UW and the 188.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 28 UW and the 188.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,100 kg (2,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 188”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 28 UW.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,150 kg (4,740 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 28 U”1,390 kg (3,064 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 188”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fahr D 28 UW is 55% heavier (760 kg / 1,676 lb) than the Steyr 188 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D 28 UW and the 188.
Which has the wider choice of gears?5Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 28 U”8Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 188”AheadThe Steyr 188 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Fahr D 28 UW (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 28 UW and the 188.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 28 U”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 188”AheadThe Steyr 188 has 50% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Fahr D 28 UW (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 28 U”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 188”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 28 U”dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 188”AheadThe Fahr D 28 UW has an independent PTO; the Steyr 188’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 28 U”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 188”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1948–19511960–1966Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Steyr 188 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fahr D 28 UW is 55% heavier (760 kg / 1,676 lb) than the Steyr 188 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 188 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Fahr D 28 UW (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 188 has 50% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Fahr D 28 UW (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fahr D 28 UW has an independent PTO; the Steyr 188’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
  • The Steyr 188 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources