Fahr D 28 UW vs International Harvester Farmall H/HV
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (27%). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
7 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | D 28 UW | Farmall H/HV | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 27.6 hp | 25.6 hp | +8% D 28 UW |
| Engine declared | Güldner 2F | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-153 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.60 L | 2.49 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 100 lb·ft · 135 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 16.2 mph · 26 km/h | +30% Farmall H/HV |
| Clutch declared | — | Pedal operated dry Rockford single disc clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 541 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,740 lb · 2,150 kg | 3,726 lb · 1,690 kg | +27% D 28 UW |
| Wheelbase declared | 85.4 in · 2,170 mm | 88.5 in · 2,248 mm | — |
| Length declared | 126.8 in · 3,220 mm | 125.2 in · 3,181 mm | — |
| Width declared | 61.6 in · 1,565 mm | 75.0 in · 1,905 mm | +22% Farmall H/HV |
| Height declared | 70.9 in · 1,800 mm | 74.0 in · 1,880 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 11.8 in · 300 mm | 24.6 in · 625 mm | +108% Farmall H/HV |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 8.1 ft · 2.46 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 31.7 qt · 30 L | 50.0 qt · 47.3 L | +58% Farmall H/HV |
Fahr D 28 UW sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 28 U”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AF 30”
International Harvester Farmall H/HV sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall-H”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Farmall-H”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Farmall-H”