Fahr D 270 B or Fahr D 30 L?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fahr D 30L: maximum permissible mass.

  • The Fahr D 30L suits road haulage better on this data: 83% (1,580 kg / 3,483 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fahr D 270 B and Fahr D 30 L, with the call on each
QuestionD 270 BD 30 LCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?22.5 kW (30.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”22.1 kW (30 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 30 L”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 270 B and the D 30 L.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 270 B and the D 30 L.
Which pumps more oil for implements?——No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 270 B and the D 30 L.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?690 kg (1,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”690 kg (1,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 30 L”EvenNo call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,880 kg (4,145 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”1,975 kg (4,354 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 30 L”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”3,480 kg (7,672 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 30 L”AheadThe Fahr D 30L has 83% higher maximum permissible mass (1,580 kg / 3,483 lb) than the Fahr D 270B (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?5 to 6Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”5Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 30 L”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 270 B and the D 30 L.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”19.9 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 30 L”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 30 L”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 30 L”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 270 B”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 30 L”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1953–19641951–1953EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fahr D 30L has 83% higher maximum permissible mass (1,580 kg / 3,483 lb) than the Fahr D 270B (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • No call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources