Fahr D 22 PH or Fahr 22?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Fahr 22: maximum permissible mass.
- The Fahr 22 suits road haulage better on this data: 16% (300 kg / 661 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 22 PH | 22 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 15.4 kW (21 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 PH” | 14.7 kW (20 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr T 22” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 22 PH and the 22. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 22 PH and the 22. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 22 PH and the 22. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 690 kg (1,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 PH” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 22. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,450 kg (3,197 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 PH” | 1,880 kg (4,145 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr T 22” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fahr 22 is 30% heavier (430 kg / 948 lb) than the Fahr D 22 PH (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 PH” | 2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr T 22” | AheadThe Fahr 22 has 16% higher maximum permissible mass (300 kg / 661 lb) than the Fahr D 22 PH (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 PH” | 3 to 5Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr T 22” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 22 PH and the 22. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 PH” | 8.0 km/h (5.0 mph) to 19.0 km/h (11.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr T 22” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 PH” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr T 22” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr T 22” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 22 PH. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 PH” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr T 22” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1951–1953 | 1940–1942 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fahr D 22 PH is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fahr 22 is 30% heavier (430 kg / 948 lb) than the Fahr D 22 PH (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fahr 22 has 16% higher maximum permissible mass (300 kg / 661 lb) than the Fahr D 22 PH (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Fahr D 22 PH is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources