Fahr D 22 P or Güldner G 25?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Güldner G 25: maximum permissible mass. It is also ahead on forward gears.

  • The Güldner G 25 suits road haulage better on this data: 42% (800 kg / 1,764 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fahr D 22 P and Güldner G 25, with the call on each
QuestionD 22 PG 25Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?16.2 kW (22 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”16.2 kW (22 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 22 P and the G 25.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 22 P and the G 25.
Which pumps more oil for implements?——No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 22 P and the G 25.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?690 kg (1,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”1,320 kg (2,910 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the D 22 P: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”); the G 25: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,350 kg (2,976 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”1,770 kg (3,902 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner G 25 is 31% heavier (420 kg / 926 lb) than the Fahr D 22P (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”AheadThe Güldner G 25 has 42% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the Fahr D 22P (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?5Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”AheadThe Güldner G 25 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Fahr D 22P (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 22 P and the G 25.
Which is faster on the road?18.2 km/h (11.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”540/1050 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the G 25.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1951–19531963–1969Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner G 25 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Güldner G 25 is 31% heavier (420 kg / 926 lb) than the Fahr D 22P (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Güldner G 25 has 42% higher maximum permissible mass (800 kg / 1,764 lb) than the Fahr D 22P (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Güldner G 25 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Fahr D 22P (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Güldner G 25 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the D 22 P: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 22 P”); the G 25: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources