Fahr D 17 N or International Harvester W-14?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Fahr D 17 N is ahead on forward gears.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fahr D 17 N and International Harvester W-14, with the call on each
QuestionD 17 NW-14Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?12.5 kW (17 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 17 N”12.0 kW (16.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick W-14”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 17 N and the W-14.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 17 N and the W-14.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 17 N and the W-14.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?690 kg (1,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 17 N”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the W-14.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,230 kg (2,712 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 17 N”1,315 kg (2,899 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick W-14”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 17 N”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the W-14.
Which has the wider choice of gears?5Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 17 N”3Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick W-14”AheadThe Fahr D 17 N has 67% more forward gears (2 gears) than the International Harvester W-14 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 17 N and the W-14.
Which is faster on the road?18.2 km/h (11.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 17 N”No figureNo call on top speed: no figure on record for the W-14.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 17 N”538 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick W-14”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the W-14.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick W-14”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 17 N.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 17 N”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “McCormick W-14”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1953–19551938–1939Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fahr D 17 N is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Fahr D 17 N has 67% more forward gears (2 gears) than the International Harvester W-14 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Fahr D 17 N is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, top speed, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources