Fahr D 160 or Lamborghini 1 R (DT)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Lamborghini 1 R (DT) is ahead on drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 160 | 1 R (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 15.4 kW (21 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 160” | 15.7 kW (21.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1 R (1961/1967)” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 160 and the 1 R (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 160 and the 1 R (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 160 and the 1 R (DT). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 690 kg (1,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 160” | 900 kg (1,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1 R (1961/1967)” | EvenNo call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,475 kg (3,252 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 160” | 1,150 kg (2,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1 R (1961/1967)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fahr D 160 is 28% heavier (325 kg / 717 lb) than the Lamborghini 1 R (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 160” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1 R (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5 to 6Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 160” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1 R (1961/1967)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 160 and the 1 R (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 18.8 km/h (11.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 160” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1 R (1961/1967)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 160” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1 R (1961/1967)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 160” | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1 R (1961/1967)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is dependent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 160” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 1 R (1961/1967)” | AheadThe Lamborghini 1 R (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Fahr D 160 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1954 | 1961–1969 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini 1 R (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fahr D 160 is 28% heavier (325 kg / 717 lb) than the Lamborghini 1 R (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Lamborghini 1 R (DT) is available with four-wheel drive; the Fahr D 160 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The Lamborghini 1 R (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- No call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is dependent.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources