Fahr D 133 N or Güldner AB?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Fahr D 133N is ahead on forward gears and PTO independence.
- The Fahr D 133N suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: an independent PTO.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 133 N | AB | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 16.9 kW (23 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 133 N” | 16.9 kW (23 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AB” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 133 N and the AB. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 133 N and the AB. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 133 N and the AB. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 900 kg (1,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 133 N” | 750 kg (1,653 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AB” | EvenNo call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,370 kg (3,020 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 133 N” | 1,460 kg (3,219 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AB” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 133 N” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the AB. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 133 N” | 6Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AB” | AheadThe Fahr D 133N has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the Güldner AB (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner AB” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 133 N. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 18.6 km/h (11.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 133 N” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AB” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | — | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner AB” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 133 N. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 133 N” | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner AB” | AheadThe Fahr D 133N has an independent PTO; the Güldner AB’s is dependent (stops with the clutch). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fahr D 133 N” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner AB” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1959–1961 | 1958–1959 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fahr D 133N has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the Güldner AB (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Fahr D 133N has an independent PTO; the Güldner AB’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- No call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources