Eicher 635 K or Renault 361?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 635 K has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Eicher 635 K suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 70% (18.1 L/min / 4.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Eicher 635 K and Renault 361, with the call on each
Question635 K361Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?26 kW (35 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”26.5 kW (35.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 635 K has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 635 K and the 361.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 635 K and the 361.
Which pumps more oil for implements?44.0 L/min (11.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”25.9 L/min (6.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”AheadThe Eicher 635 K has 70% more hydraulic flow (18.1 L/min / 4.8 gpm) than the Renault 361 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,615 kg (3,560 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”2,040 kg (4,497 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 635 K: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”); the 361: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,510 kg (3,329 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”2,185 kg (4,817 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 361 is 45% heavier (675 kg / 1,488 lb) than the Eicher 635 K (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 635 K and the 361.
Which has the wider choice of gears?11Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 635 K.
Which is faster on the road?25.4 km/h (15.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 635 K.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19931972–1977Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher 635 K is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Eicher 635 K has 70% more hydraulic flow (18.1 L/min / 4.8 gpm) than the Renault 361 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 361 is 45% heavier (675 kg / 1,488 lb) than the Eicher 635 K (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Eicher 635 K is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 635 K has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 361 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 635 K: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”); the 361: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 361 R7421”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources