Eicher 635 K or Hermann Lanz D 634 L?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 635 K has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 634 L has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Eicher 635 K and Hermann Lanz D 634 L, with the call on each
Question635 KD 634 LCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?26 kW (35 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”25.6 kW (34.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 635 K has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 634 L has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 635 K and the D 634 L.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 635 K and the D 634 L.
Which pumps more oil for implements?44.0 L/min (11.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 634 L.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,615 kg (3,560 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 635 K: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”); the D 634 L: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,510 kg (3,329 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”1,780 kg (3,924 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hermann Lanz D 634 L is 18% heavier (270 kg / 595 lb) than the Eicher 635 K (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 635 K and the D 634 L.
Which has the wider choice of gears?11Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”8 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 635 K.
Which is faster on the road?25.4 km/h (15.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”545/1050 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 634 L.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 635 K.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19931977–1980Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher 635 K is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hermann Lanz D 634 L is 18% heavier (270 kg / 595 lb) than the Eicher 635 K (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Eicher 635 K is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 635 K has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 634 L has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 635 K: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 635 K”); the D 634 L: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources