Eicher 554 S or Renault 88?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Eicher 554S is ahead on forward gears, PTO speeds and drive.

  • The Eicher 554S suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The Eicher 554S suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Eicher 554 S and Renault 88, with the call on each
Question554 S88Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?35.6 kW (47.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”35.9 kW (48.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 554 S and the 88.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 554 S and the 88.
Which pumps more oil for implements?26.0 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”24.5 L/min (6.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 554 S.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,935 kg (4,266 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”2,040 kg (4,497 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 554 S and the 88.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”AheadThe Eicher 554S has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Renault 88 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”—No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 88.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”AheadThe Eicher 554S offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 88 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 554 S”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 88 R7261”AheadThe Eicher 554S is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 88 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1981–19861967–1971Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher 554S is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Eicher 554S has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Renault 88 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Eicher 554S offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 88 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Eicher 554S is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 88 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Eicher 554S is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources