Eicher 4038 or Massey Ferguson MF 230?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Eicher 4038 is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Eicher 4038 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Eicher 4038 and Massey Ferguson MF 230, with the call on each
Question4038MF 230Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?24.8 kW (33.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 4038”25.4 kW (34.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 4038 and the MF 230.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 4038 and the MF 230.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—17.0 L/min (4.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 4038.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,693 kg (3,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 4038”1,415 kg (3,120 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 4038: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 4038”); the MF 230: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,170 kg (4,784 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 4038”1,730 kg (3,814 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher 4038 is 25% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 230 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 4038”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 230.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 4038”6 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 4038 and the MF 230.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 4038”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 4038”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”AheadThe Eicher 4038 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 230 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 4038.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 4038”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1978–19821976–1983EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Eicher 4038 is 25% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 230 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Eicher 4038 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 230 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 4038: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 4038”); the MF 230: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 230”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources