Eicher 3708 vs WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B
8 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 3708 and the WT-32 B → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
8 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 3708 | WT-32 B | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 29.6 hp | 29.6 hp | — |
| Engine declared | — | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144 | — |
| Displacement declared | — | 2.36 L | — |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 105 lb·ft · 142 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 15.3 mph · 24.6 km/h | 18.6 mph · 30 km/h | +22% WT-32 B |
| Clutch declared | double clutch by Fichtel & Sachs type DO 250/225 | Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single plate clutch type K-16 | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.1 gpm · 15.4 L/min | — | — |
| Pressure declared | 2,489 psi · 172 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | — | 3,968 lb · 1,800 kg | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 602/1143 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,527 lb · 1,600 kg | 3,417 lb · 1,550 kg | — |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 5,512 lb · 2,500 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 72.4–74.0 in · 1,840–1,880 mm | 77.6 in · 1,970 mm | differs |
| Length declared | 109.1–110.2 in · 2,770–2,800 mm | 128.3 in · 3,260 mm | differs |
| Width declared | 36.2–46.1 in · 920–1,170 mm | 60.2 in · 1,530 mm | differs |
| Height declared | 48.0 in · 1,220 mm | 59.8 in · 1,520 mm | +25% WT-32 B |
| Ground clearance declared | 8.7 in · 220 mm | 15.6 in · 395 mm | +80% WT-32 B |
| Fuel tank declared | 37.0 qt · 35 L | 38.0 qt · 36.0 L | — |
Eicher 3708 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3708”
WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 B sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 32B”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-250”