Eicher 3708 vs WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32

8 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Eicher 3708

1970–1971

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32

1968–1970

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

We will not advise between these two machines, because the drive differs (4WD; 2WD / 4WD). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.

Field by field

8 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Eicher 3708 and WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32, field by field
Field3708WT-32Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed29.6 hp29.6 hp
Engine declaredINTERNATIONAL HARVESTER BD-144
Displacement declared2.36 L
Maximum torque declared105 lb·ft · 142 N·m
Transmission
Top speed declared15.3 mph · 24.6 km/h18.6 mph · 30 km/h+22% WT-32
Clutch declareddouble clutch by Fichtel & Sachs type DO 250/225Pedal operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single disc clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared4.1 gpm · 15.4 L/min
Pressure declared2,489 psi · 172 bar
Three-point lift at ends declared2,646 lb · 1,200 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared602/1143 rpm540 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared3,527 lb · 1,600 kg3,395 lb · 1,540 kg
Maximum permissible mass declared5,512 lb · 2,500 kg
Wheelbase declared72.4–74.0 in · 1,840–1,880 mm77.6 in · 1,970 mmdiffers
Length declared109.1–110.2 in · 2,770–2,800 mm128.3 in · 3,260 mmdiffers
Width declared36.2–46.1 in · 920–1,170 mm60.2 in · 1,530 mmdiffers
Height declared48.0 in · 1,220 mm59.8 in · 1,520 mm+25% WT-32
Ground clearance declared8.7 in · 220 mm15.6 in · 395 mm+80% WT-32
Turning radius, braked declared7.9 ft · 2.40 m
Fuel tank declared37.0 qt · 35 L38.0 qt · 36.0 L

Eicher 3708 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3708”

WARCHALOWSKI-MC CORMICK WT-32 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 32”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick B-250”