Eicher 3554 Büffel 74 A or Massey Ferguson MF 3050 E?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Massey Ferguson 3050E is ahead on forward gears and PTO speeds.

  • The Massey Ferguson 3050E suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Eicher 3554 Büffel 74 A and Massey Ferguson MF 3050 E, with the call on each
Question3554 Büffel 74 AMF 3050 ECall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?44.9 kW (60 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3554 Büffel 74 A”45.5 kW (61.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3050E”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 3554 Büffel 74 A and the MF 3050 E.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 3554 Büffel 74 A and the MF 3050 E.
Which pumps more oil for implements?19 L/min (5.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3554 Büffel 74 A”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 3050 E.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—2,881 kg (6,351 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3050E”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 3554 Büffel 74 A.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,450 kg (7,606 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3554 Büffel 74 A”3,560 kg (7,848 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3050E”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3554 Büffel 74 A and the MF 3050 E.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3554 Büffel 74 A”16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3050E”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 3050E has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Eicher 3554 Büffel 74A (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 3554 Büffel 74 A and the MF 3050 E.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3554 Büffel 74 A”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3050E”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3554 Büffel 74 A”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3050E”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 3050E offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Eicher 3554 Büffel 74A does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3554 Büffel 74 A”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3050E”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3554 Büffel 74 A”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 3050E”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1974–19781988–1995Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 3050E is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 3050E has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Eicher 3554 Büffel 74A (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 3050E offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Eicher 3554 Büffel 74A does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Massey Ferguson 3050E is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources