Eicher Mammut 3354 or OLIVER 1450 (4 WD)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the OLIVER 1450 (4 WD): hydraulic flow.

  • The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 39% (7.5 L/min / 2.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Eicher Mammut 3354 and OLIVER 1450 (4 WD), with the call on each
QuestionMammut 33541450 (4 WD)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.5 kW (54 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3354 Mammut 74 A”40.3 kW (54.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Mammut 3354 and the 1450 (4 WD).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Mammut 3354 and the 1450 (4 WD).
Which pumps more oil for implements?19.0 L/min (5.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3354 Mammut 74 A”26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”AheadThe OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) has 39% more hydraulic flow (7.5 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Eicher Mammut 3354 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3354 Mammut 74 A”1,825 kg (4,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,650 kg (5,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3354 Mammut 74 A”2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Mammut 3354 and the 1450 (4 WD).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3354 Mammut 74 A”7 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Mammut 3354 and the 1450 (4 WD).
Which is faster on the road?24 km/h (14.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3354 Mammut 74 A”23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3354 Mammut 74 A”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3354 Mammut 74 A”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3354 Mammut 74 A”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1974–19781967–1969Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher Mammut 3354 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) has 39% more hydraulic flow (7.5 L/min / 2.0 gpm) than the Eicher Mammut 3354 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Eicher Mammut 3354 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources