Eicher Königstiger 3254 74 A or Steyr 290?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Steyr 290 is ahead on top speed and PTO speeds; the Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A is ahead on drive.

  • The Steyr 290 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 18% (350 kg / 772 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
  • The Steyr 290 suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Eicher Königstiger 3254 74 A and Steyr 290, with the call on each
QuestionKönigstiger 3254 74 A290Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3254 Königstiger 74 A”33.1 kW (44 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 290”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Königstiger 3254 74 A and the 290.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Königstiger 3254 74 A and the 290.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 290”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Königstiger 3254 74 A.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,680 kg (3,704 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3254 Königstiger 74 A”1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 290”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Königstiger 3254 74 A: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3254 Königstiger 74 A”); the 290: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 290”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,320 kg (5,115 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3254 Königstiger 74 A”1,970 kg (4,343 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 290”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A is 18% heavier (350 kg / 772 lb) than the Steyr 290 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Königstiger 3254 74 A and the 290.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3254 Königstiger 74 A”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 290”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Königstiger 3254 74 A and the 290.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3254 Königstiger 74 A”28 km/h (17.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 290”AheadThe Steyr 290 has 12% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3254 Königstiger 74 A”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 290”AheadThe Steyr 290 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3254 Königstiger 74 A”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 290.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3254 Königstiger 74 A”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 290”AheadThe Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A is available with four-wheel drive; the Steyr 290 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1975–19771966–1967Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A is 18% heavier (350 kg / 772 lb) than the Steyr 290 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 290 has 12% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr 290 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A is available with four-wheel drive; the Steyr 290 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Eicher Königstiger 3254 74A is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Königstiger 3254 74 A: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3254 Königstiger 74 A”); the 290: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 290”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources