Eicher 3072 or VALMET 605/605-4?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 3072 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 605/605-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Eicher 3072 and VALMET 605/605-4, with the call on each
Question3072605/605-4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?53.0 kW (71 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3072”53.0 kW (71.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3072 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 605/605-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 3072 and the 605/605-4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 3072 and the 605/605-4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—52.7 L/min (13.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 3072.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,700 kg (8,157 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3072”3,946 kg (8,699 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 3072: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3072”); the 605/605-4: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,915 kg (8,631 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3072”3,440 kg (7,584 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Eicher 3072 is 14% heavier (475 kg / 1,047 lb) than the VALMET 605/605-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3072 and the 605/605-4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3072”8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 3072 and the 605/605-4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3072”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3072”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 3072.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3072”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1985–19901983–1989EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Eicher 3072 is 14% heavier (475 kg / 1,047 lb) than the VALMET 605/605-4 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 3072 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 605/605-4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 3072: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3072”); the 605/605-4: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet 605”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources