Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A or VOLVO-BM T 500?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Mammut 3020 HR A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 500 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The VOLVO-BM T 500 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.
  • The VOLVO-BM T 500 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A and VOLVO-BM T 500, with the call on each
QuestionMammut 3020 HR AT 500Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?45.4 kW (60.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3020 Mammut HR A”44.9 kW (60.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 500”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Mammut 3020 HR A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 500 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Mammut 3020 HR A and the T 500.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Mammut 3020 HR A and the T 500.
Which pumps more oil for implements?39 L/min (10.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3020 Mammut HR A”45.0 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 500”AheadThe VOLVO-BM T 500 has 15% more hydraulic flow (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3020 Mammut HR A”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the T 500.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,065 kg (6,757 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3020 Mammut HR A”2,980 kg (6,570 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 500”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3020 Mammut HR A”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the T 500.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3020 Mammut HR A”8 to 16 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 500”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A is stepless (CVT) and the VOLVO-BM T 500 has 8 to 16 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Mammut 3020 HR A and the T 500.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3020 Mammut HR A”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 500”AheadThe VOLVO-BM T 500 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?590/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3020 Mammut HR A”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 500”DifferPTO speeds differ: the Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A 1000 rpm and the VOLVO-BM T 500 540 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 500”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Mammut 3020 HR A.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Eicher 3020 Mammut HR A”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Bolinder-Munktell T 500”AheadThe Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A is available with four-wheel drive; the VOLVO-BM T 500 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1970–19721974–1978EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The VOLVO-BM T 500 has 15% more hydraulic flow (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The VOLVO-BM T 500 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A is available with four-wheel drive; the VOLVO-BM T 500 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A is stepless (CVT) and the VOLVO-BM T 500 has 8 to 16 forward gears — not called.
  • PTO speeds differ: the Eicher Mammut 3020 HR A 1000 rpm and the VOLVO-BM T 500 540 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Mammut 3020 HR A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T 500 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources