Dexheimer Allrad 345 N or Ford 3930 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Allrad 345 N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3930 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Dexheimer Allrad 345N suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (7.8 L/min / 2.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Ford 3930 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Allrad 345 N | 3930 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 37 kW (50 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N” | 37.5 kW (50.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Allrad 345 N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3930 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Allrad 345 N and the 3930 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Allrad 345 N and the 3930 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 41 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N” | 33.2 L/min (8.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930” | AheadThe Dexheimer Allrad 345N has 23% more hydraulic flow (7.8 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Ford 3930 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N” | 1,950 kg (4,299 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Allrad 345 N: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”); the 3930 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,625 kg (3,583 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N” | 2,742 kg (6,045 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 3930 (A) is 69% heavier (1,117 kg / 2,463 lb) than the Dexheimer Allrad 345N (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Allrad 345 N and the 3930 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Allrad 345 N and the 3930 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930” | AheadThe Ford 3930 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Dexheimer Allrad 345N (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | — | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Allrad 345 N. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Allrad 345 N. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1976–1985 | 1990–1999 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford 3930 (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Dexheimer Allrad 345N has 23% more hydraulic flow (7.8 L/min / 2.1 gpm) than the Ford 3930 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 3930 (A) is 69% heavier (1,117 kg / 2,463 lb) than the Dexheimer Allrad 345N (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 3930 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Dexheimer Allrad 345N (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Ford 3930 (A) is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Allrad 345 N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3930 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Allrad 345 N: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”); the 3930 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford 3930”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources