Deutz (KHD) Intrac 2004 or Schlüter Compact 750 V4?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Intrac 2004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Compact 750 V4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz (KHD) Intrac 2004 and Schlüter Compact 750 V4, with the call on each
QuestionIntrac 2004Compact 750 V4Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?51.2 kW (68.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”51.2 kW (68.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 750V 4”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Intrac 2004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Compact 750 V4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Intrac 2004 and the Compact 750 V4.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Intrac 2004 and the Compact 750 V4.
Which pumps more oil for implements?47.1 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Compact 750 V4.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 750V 4”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Intrac 2004: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”); the Compact 750 V4: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 750V 4”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”3,900 kg (8,598 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 750V 4”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Compact 750 V4 is 22% heavier (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Deutz Intrac 2004 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,350 kg (11,795 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Compact 750 V4.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”16Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 750V 4”AheadThe Schlüter Compact 750 V4 has 100% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Deutz Intrac 2004 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Intrac 2004 and the Compact 750 V4.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”38.3 km/h (23.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 750V 4”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 750V 4”AheadThe Schlüter Compact 750 V4 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz Intrac 2004 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 750V 4”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 750V 4”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1978–19891984Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Compact 750 V4 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Schlüter Compact 750 V4 is 22% heavier (700 kg / 1,543 lb) than the Deutz Intrac 2004 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Schlüter Compact 750 V4 has 100% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Deutz Intrac 2004 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Schlüter Compact 750 V4 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz Intrac 2004 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Schlüter Compact 750 V4 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Intrac 2004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Compact 750 V4 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Intrac 2004: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz INTRAC 2004”); the Compact 750 V4: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Compact 750V 4”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources