Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A or Renault 85-32 MX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DX 3.75 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 85-32 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 85-32 MX suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (525 kg / 1,157 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A and Renault 85-32 MX, with the call on each
QuestionDX 3.75 A85-32 MXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?57.1 kW (76.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A”57.4 kW (77.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DX 3.75 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 85-32 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DX 3.75 A and the 85-32 MX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DX 3.75 A and the 85-32 MX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A”41.4 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,300 kg (7,275 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A”3,825 kg (8,433 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”AheadThe Renault 85-32 MX has 16% more lift (525 kg / 1,157 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,210 kg (7,077 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A”3,420 kg (7,540 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 85-32 MX.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DX 3.75 A and the 85-32 MX.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 85-32 ME/MA/MS/MX R3161”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 85-32 MX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1993–19961989–1993EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 85-32 MX has 16% more lift (525 kg / 1,157 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.75 A is available with four-wheel drive; the Renault 85-32 MX is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DX 3.75 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 85-32 MX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources