Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 or J.I. Case 1494 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 is ahead on forward gears.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 and J.I. Case 1494 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionDX 3.501494 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.7 kW (54.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”41.1 kW (55.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DX 3.50 and the 1494 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DX 3.50 and the 1494 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1494 (DT).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”2,435 kg (5,368 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,730 kg (6,019 lb) to 3,120 kg (6,878 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”3,345 kg (7,374 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”—No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1494 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 1494 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DX 3.50 and the 1494 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1494”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19961984–1985EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the J.I. Case 1494 (DT) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources