Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 or Fendt Farmer 260 S?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Fendt Farmer 260S is ahead on forward gears.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | DX 3.50 | Farmer 260 S | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 40.7 kW (54.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50” | 39.9 kW (53.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 S/SA” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DX 3.50 and the Farmer 260 S. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DX 3.50 and the Farmer 260 S. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50” | 41.5 L/min (11.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 S/SA” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Farmer 260 S. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,730 kg (6,019 lb) to 3,120 kg (6,878 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50” | 2,520 kg (5,556 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 S/SA” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Farmer 260 S. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50” | 21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 S/SA” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 260S has 31% more forward gears (5 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DX 3.50 and the Farmer 260 S. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 S/SA” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50” | 540/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 S/SA” | DifferPTO speeds differ: the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 540/1000 rpm and the Fendt Farmer 260S 540/750 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 S/SA” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 S/SA” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1984–1996 | 1988– | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Farmer 260S has 31% more forward gears (5 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- PTO speeds differ: the Deutz-Fahr DX 3.50 540/1000 rpm and the Fendt Farmer 260S 540/750 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources