Deutz-Fahr D 6507 (C) or John Deere 1950 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 6507 (C) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1950 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 6507 (C) | 1950 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 46 kW (62 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6507” | 45.6 kW (61.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1950” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 6507 (C) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1950 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 6507 (C) and the 1950 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 6507 (C) and the 1950 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.8 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6507” | 50.2 L/min (13.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1950” | AheadThe John Deere 1950 (A) has 58% more hydraulic flow (18.4 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr D 6507 (C) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6507” | 2,172 kg (4,788 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1950” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr D 6507 (C) has 10% more lift (228 kg / 503 lb) than the John Deere 1950 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,530 kg (5,578 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6507” | 2,790 kg (6,151 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1950” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 1950 (A) is 10% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr D 6507 (C) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6507” | 4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1950” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6507” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1950” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 6507 (C) and the 1950 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6507” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1950” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6507” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1950” | AheadThe John Deere 1950 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr D 6507 (C) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1950” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 6507 (C). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 6507” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 1950” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1982–1984 | 1987–1994 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 1950 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 1950 (A) has 58% more hydraulic flow (18.4 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr D 6507 (C) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr D 6507 (C) has 10% more lift (228 kg / 503 lb) than the John Deere 1950 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 1950 (A) is 10% heavier (260 kg / 573 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr D 6507 (C) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 1950 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr D 6507 (C) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The John Deere 1950 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 6507 (C) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1950 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources