Deutz-Fahr D 2807 or UTB U-300?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 2807 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-300 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr D 2807 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 61% (13.2 L/min / 3.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr D 2807 and UTB U-300, with the call on each
QuestionD 2807U-300Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?21 kW (28 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 2807”19.9 kW (26.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 300”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 2807 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-300 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 2807 and the U-300.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 2807 and the U-300.
Which pumps more oil for implements?35.0 L/min (9.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 2807”21.8 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 300”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr D 2807 has 61% more hydraulic flow (13.2 L/min / 3.5 gpm) than the UTB U-300 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,900 kg (4,189 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 2807”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the U-300.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,840 kg (4,057 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 2807”1,591 kg (3,508 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 300”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr D 2807 is 16% heavier (249 kg / 549 lb) than the UTB U-300 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 2807”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the U-300.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 2807”6 to 9Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 300”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 2807 and the U-300.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 2807”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 300”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 2807”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 300”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 2807 and the U-300.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr D 2807”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 300”AheadThe UTB U-300 is available with four-wheel drive; the Deutz-Fahr D 2807 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19881980–1991EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr D 2807 has 61% more hydraulic flow (13.2 L/min / 3.5 gpm) than the UTB U-300 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr D 2807 is 16% heavier (249 kg / 549 lb) than the UTB U-300 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The UTB U-300 is available with four-wheel drive; the Deutz-Fahr D 2807 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 2807 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the U-300 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources