Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 or New Holland TN 60 DA/SA?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the AgroXtra 3.57 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TN 60 DA/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland TN 60 DA/SA suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 24% (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | AgroXtra 3.57 | TN 60 DA/SA | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 43.9 kW (58.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | 43.4 kW (58.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroXtra 3.57 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TN 60 DA/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroXtra 3.57 and the TN 60 DA/SA. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroXtra 3.57 and the TN 60 DA/SA. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | 47.0 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | AheadThe New Holland TN 60 DA/SA has 24% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | 2,435 kg (5,368 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,290 kg (7,253 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | 2,365 kg (5,214 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 is 39% heavier (925 kg / 2,039 lb) than the New Holland TN 60 DA/SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the TN 60 DA/SA. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | 16 to 28Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the AgroXtra 3.57 and the TN 60 DA/SA. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland TN 60 DA/SA does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TN60 DA/SA” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1991–1996 | 2003–2008 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TN 60 DA/SA is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TN 60 DA/SA has 24% more hydraulic flow (9.0 L/min / 2.4 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 is 39% heavier (925 kg / 2,039 lb) than the New Holland TN 60 DA/SA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland TN 60 DA/SA does not (as stated by the sources).
- The New Holland TN 60 DA/SA is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroXtra 3.57 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TN 60 DA/SA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources