Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 or Fendt Farmer 260 P/PA?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the AgroXtra 3.57 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 260 P/PA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (500 kg / 1,102 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 and Fendt Farmer 260 P/PA, with the call on each
QuestionAgroXtra 3.57Farmer 260 P/PACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?43.9 kW (58.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57”43.9 kW (58.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 P”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroXtra 3.57 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 260 P/PA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AgroXtra 3.57 and the Farmer 260 P/PA.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AgroXtra 3.57 and the Farmer 260 P/PA.
Which pumps more oil for implements?38.0 L/min (10.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57”41.0 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 P”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,400 kg (5,291 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Farmer 260 P/PA.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,290 kg (7,253 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57”2,340 kg (5,159 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 P”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 is 41% heavier (950 kg / 2,094 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 260 P/PA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57”4,000 kg (8,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 P”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 260 P/PA (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57”21Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 P”AheadThe Fendt Farmer 260 P/PA has 31% more forward gears (5 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the AgroXtra 3.57 and the Farmer 260 P/PA.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 P”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 P”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 offers 750 and 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fendt Farmer 260 P/PA does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 P”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 260 P”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1991–19961988–1992EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 is 41% heavier (950 kg / 2,094 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 260 P/PA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (500 kg / 1,102 lb) than the Fendt Farmer 260 P/PA (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Farmer 260 P/PA has 31% more forward gears (5 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr AgroXtra 3.57 offers 750 and 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fendt Farmer 260 P/PA does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the AgroXtra 3.57 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 260 P/PA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources