Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) or ZETOR 10641?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) suits road haulage better on this data: 19% (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) | 10641 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 76.5 kW (102.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110” | 77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) and the 10641. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) and the 10641. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Agrotron K 110 (Profiline). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,220 kg (13,713 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110” | 5,782 kg (12,747 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,850 kg (10,692 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110” | 4,075 kg (8,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) is 19% heavier (775 kg / 1,709 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110” | 6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) has 19% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) and the 10641. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2005–2008 | 1999–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) is 19% heavier (775 kg / 1,709 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) has 19% higher maximum permissible mass (1,300 kg / 2,866 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron K 110 (Profiline) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources