Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30 or Lamborghini 135 DT Formula?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 6.30 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 135 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 36% (21.9 L/min / 5.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 79% (4,078 kg / 8,990 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30 and Lamborghini 135 DT Formula, with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 6.30135 DT FormulaCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?97.2 kW (130.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30”97.1 kW (130.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 6.30 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 135 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.30 and the 135 DT Formula.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.30 and the 135 DT Formula.
Which pumps more oil for implements?82.8 L/min (21.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30”60.9 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30 has 36% more hydraulic flow (21.9 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30”5,162 kg (11,380 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30 has 79% more lift (4,078 kg / 8,990 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,360 kg (11,817 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30”4,680 kg (10,318 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30 is 15% heavier (680 kg / 1,499 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.30.
Which has the wider choice of gears?20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30”24 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 6.30 and the 135 DT Formula.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT A Formula”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–19971991–1996EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30 has 36% more hydraulic flow (21.9 L/min / 5.8 gpm) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30 has 79% more lift (4,078 kg / 8,990 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.30 is 15% heavier (680 kg / 1,499 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT Formula (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 6.30 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 135 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources