Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00 or New Holland T-4050?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 6.00 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-4050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 29% (18.5 L/min / 4.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00 suits road haulage better on this data: 62% (3,250 kg / 7,165 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrotron 6.00 | T-4050 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 70.8 kW (94.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00” | 71.3 kW (95.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 4050” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 6.00 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-4050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.00 and the T-4050. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.00 and the T-4050. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 82.3 L/min (21.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00” | 63.8 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 4050” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00 has 29% more hydraulic flow (18.5 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the New Holland T-4050 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 4050” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.00. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,010 kg (11,045 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00” | 3,760 kg (8,289 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 4050” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00 is 33% heavier (1,250 kg / 2,756 lb) than the New Holland T-4050 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00” | 5,250 kg (11,574 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 4050” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00 has 62% higher maximum permissible mass (3,250 kg / 7,165 lb) than the New Holland T-4050 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 15 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 4050” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 4050” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 6.00. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 4050” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 4050” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the T-4050. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T 4050” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–1997 | 2008–2014 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T-4050 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00 has 29% more hydraulic flow (18.5 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the New Holland T-4050 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00 is 33% heavier (1,250 kg / 2,756 lb) than the New Holland T-4050 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.00 has 62% higher maximum permissible mass (3,250 kg / 7,165 lb) than the New Holland T-4050 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland T-4050 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 6.00 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the T-4050 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources