Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 or URSUS 1.002 / 1.004?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 4.95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.002 / 1.004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 48% (2,019 kg / 4,451 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 and URSUS 1.002 / 1.004, with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 4.951.002 / 1.004Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?70.8 kW (94.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95”70.6 kW (94.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 4.95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.002 / 1.004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 4.95 and the 1.002 / 1.004.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 4.95 and the 1.002 / 1.004.
Which pumps more oil for implements?64.5 L/min (17.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 1.002 / 1.004.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,220 kg (13,713 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95”4,201 kg (9,262 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 has 48% more lift (2,019 kg / 4,451 lb) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,220 kg (9,304 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95”3,500 kg (7,716 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 is 21% heavier (720 kg / 1,587 lb) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1.002 / 1.004.
Which has the wider choice of gears?21 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95”16Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 has 31% more forward gears (5 gears) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 4.95 and the 1.002 / 1.004.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 1.002 / 1.004.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1002/1004”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–19971984–2009Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 has 48% more lift (2,019 kg / 4,451 lb) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 is 21% heavier (720 kg / 1,587 lb) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 has 31% more forward gears (5 gears) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the URSUS 1.002 / 1.004 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.95 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 4.95 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1.002 / 1.004 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources