Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3 or New Holland TG 255 (Traktorenlexikon)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 260 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 255 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrotron 260 MK3 | TG 255 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 191.4 kW (256.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3” | 189.8 kW (254.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG255” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 260 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 255 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 260 MK3 and the TG 255. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 260 MK3 and the TG 255. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 120.3 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3” | 146.5 L/min (38.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG255” | AheadThe New Holland TG 255 has 22% more hydraulic flow (26.2 L/min / 6.9 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3” | 4,290 kg (9,458 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG255” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3 has 145% more lift (6,210 kg / 13,691 lb) than the New Holland TG 255 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,350 kg (18,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3” | 9,643 kg (21,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG255” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TG 255 is 15% heavier (1,293 kg / 2,851 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3” | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG255” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3” | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG255” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 260 MK3 and the TG 255. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG255” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG255” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG255” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TG255”; OECD test report 2187, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2001–2003 | 2002–2005 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TG 255 has 22% more hydraulic flow (26.2 L/min / 6.9 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3 has 145% more lift (6,210 kg / 13,691 lb) than the New Holland TG 255 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TG 255 is 15% heavier (1,293 kg / 2,851 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 260 MK3 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 260 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TG 255 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources