Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 or Renault Atles 926 RZ?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 230 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 926 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault Atles 926 RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 17% (1,750 kg / 3,858 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 suits road haulage better on this data: 13% (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 and Renault Atles 926 RZ, with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 230 MK3Atles 926 RZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?169.2 kW (226.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3”166.3 kW (223.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 230 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 926 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 230 MK3 and the Atles 926 RZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 230 MK3 and the Atles 926 RZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?120.3 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Atles 926 RZ.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3”12,250 kg (27,007 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”AheadThe Renault Atles 926 RZ has 17% more lift (1,750 kg / 3,858 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?8,350 kg (18,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3”9,690 kg (21,363 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Atles 926 RZ is 16% heavier (1,340 kg / 2,954 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3”12,350 kg (27,227 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) than the Renault Atles 926 RZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3”18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 230 MK3 and the Atles 926 RZ.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3”540/1000 rpmOECD test report 2154, 2004AheadThe Renault Atles 926 RZ offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”; OECD test report 2154, 2004EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2001–20032001–2004EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault Atles 926 RZ has 17% more lift (1,750 kg / 3,858 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Atles 926 RZ is 16% heavier (1,340 kg / 2,954 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 has 13% higher maximum permissible mass (1,650 kg / 3,638 lb) than the Renault Atles 926 RZ (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Atles 926 RZ offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 230 MK3 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 230 MK3 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 926 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources