Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 or VALMET 8550 HiTech?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8550 HiTech has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 56% (41.4 L/min / 10.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 45% (3,100 kg / 6,834 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 suits road haulage better on this data: 41% (3,500 kg / 7,716 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 and VALMET 8550 HiTech, with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 1608550 HiTechCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?117.8 kW (158.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160”117.7 kW (157.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550 HiTech”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8550 HiTech has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 160 and the 8550 HiTech.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 160 and the 8550 HiTech.
Which pumps more oil for implements?115.0 L/min (30.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160”73.6 L/min (19.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550 HiTech”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 has 56% more hydraulic flow (41.4 L/min / 10.9 gpm) than the VALMET 8550 HiTech (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160”6,900 kg (15,212 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550 HiTech”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 has 45% more lift (3,100 kg / 6,834 lb) than the VALMET 8550 HiTech (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,900 kg (15,212 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160”5,100 kg (11,244 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550 HiTech”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 is 35% heavier (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) than the VALMET 8550 HiTech (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160”8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550 HiTech”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 has 41% higher maximum permissible mass (3,500 kg / 7,716 lb) than the VALMET 8550 HiTech (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160”36Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550 HiTech”AheadThe VALMET 8550 HiTech has 100% more forward gears (18 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 160 and the 8550 HiTech.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550 HiTech”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550 HiTech”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550 HiTech”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrotron 160.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Valmet Mega-8550 HiTech”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1997–20011998–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 has 56% more hydraulic flow (41.4 L/min / 10.9 gpm) than the VALMET 8550 HiTech (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 has 45% more lift (3,100 kg / 6,834 lb) than the VALMET 8550 HiTech (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 is 35% heavier (1,800 kg / 3,968 lb) than the VALMET 8550 HiTech (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 has 41% higher maximum permissible mass (3,500 kg / 7,716 lb) than the VALMET 8550 HiTech (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The VALMET 8550 HiTech has 100% more forward gears (18 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8550 HiTech has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources