Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 or Renault Ares 715 RZ?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 156 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 715 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 45% (37.0 L/min / 9.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 25% (2,320 kg / 5,115 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ suits road haulage better on this data: 26% (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 and Renault Ares 715 RZ, with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 156Ares 715 RZCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?114.8 kW (153.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156”114.8 kW (153.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 156 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 715 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 156 and the Ares 715 RZ.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 156 and the Ares 715 RZ.
Which pumps more oil for implements?83.0 L/min (21.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156”120.0 L/min (31.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 715 RZ has 45% more hydraulic flow (37.0 L/min / 9.8 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156”11,560 kg (25,485 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 715 RZ has 25% more lift (2,320 kg / 5,115 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,690 kg (12,544 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156”7,380 kg (16,270 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 715 RZ is 30% heavier (1,690 kg / 3,726 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156”12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 715 RZ has 26% higher maximum permissible mass (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156”32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”AheadThe Renault Ares 715 RZ has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 156 and the Ares 715 RZ.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Ares 715 RZ.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 715 RZ”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20002000–2002EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ has 45% more hydraulic flow (37.0 L/min / 9.8 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ has 25% more lift (2,320 kg / 5,115 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ is 30% heavier (1,690 kg / 3,726 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ has 26% higher maximum permissible mass (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault Ares 715 RZ has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 156 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 156 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Ares 715 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources